Development of the Environment Readiness Index (ENRI) for Supporting Infrastructure Assessment in CNSD Facilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54147/langitbiru.v18i3.1620Keywords:
Environment Readiness Index, EnRI, CNSD, Supporting Infrastructure, ANSI/TIA-942, RCMS, TIER III, Remote Control Monitoring SystemAbstract
The reliability of Communication, Navigation, Surveillance and Data Processing (CNSD) facilities is highly dependent on the readiness of their supporting infrastructure, including power systems, thermal and humidity control, grounding and lightning protection, physical environment, and monitoring systems. However, no integrated assessment model is currently available to comprehensively evaluate these critical supporting components. This study develops the Environment Readiness Index (EnRI) as an integrated assessment framework for measuring the readiness of supporting infrastructure in CNSD facilities. A quantitative research approach was employed through field observations, interviews, and infrastructure assessments involving 172 CNSD facilities. The proposed EnRI framework evaluates infrastructure readiness across five key domains: Thermal and Humidity Control, Power Quality and Continuity, Grounding and Lightning Protection, Physical Environment, and Monitoring and Control System (RCMS), with reference to the reliability principles of Tier III and ANSI/TIA-942. The assessment results demonstrate that EnRI effectively identifies infrastructure readiness levels, determines gaps against established standards, and supports the prioritization of infrastructure improvement programs. The proposed framework provides a systematic decision-support tool for infrastructure evaluation, investment planning, and continuous improvement of CNSD facility reliability. Unlike existing assessment approaches that evaluate supporting infrastructure separately, EnRI integrates five critical infrastructure domains into a unified readiness assessment framework specifically designed for CNSD facilities.
Downloads
References
1. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2018). Annex 10—Aeronautical Telecommunications (Vols. I–V). ICAO.
2. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2022). Safety Management Manual (Doc 9859) (5th ed.). ICAO.
3. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2022). Global Air Navigation Plan 2020–2030. ICAO.
4. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2018). Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157). ICAO.
5. ANSI/TIA. (2017). ANSI/TIA-942-B: Telecommunications Infrastructure Standard for Data Centers. Telecommunications Industry Association.
6. IEEE. (2007). IEEE Std 493-2007: Recommended Practice for the Design of Reliable Industrial and Commercial Power Systems. IEEE.
7. IEEE. (2005). IEEE Std 1100-2005: Recommended Practice for Powering and Grounding Electronic Equipment. IEEE.
8. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2010). IEC 62305: Protection Against Lightning. IEC.
9. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk Management—Guidelines. ISO.
10. International Organization for Standardization. (2014). ISO 55000: Asset Management—Overview, Principles and Terminology. ISO.
11. Uptime Institute. (2022). Tier Standard: Topology. Uptime Institute.
12. Uptime Institute. (2022). Operational Sustainability Standard. Uptime Institute.
13. ASHRAE. (2021). Thermal Guidelines for Data Processing Environments (5th ed.).
14. Dhumal, A. R., Kulkarni, A. P., & Ambhore, N. H. (2023). A comprehensive review on thermal management of electronic devices. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00309-2
15. Arranz-Gimón, A., et al. (2021). A review of total harmonic distortion factors for the measurement of harmonic and interharmonic pollution in modern power systems. Energies, 14(20), 6467. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206467
16. Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012
17. Mobley, R. K. (2002). An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
18. Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability-Centered Maintenance (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
19. Hollnagel, E. (2011). Resilience Engineering in Practice. Ashgate.
20. Leveson, N. G. (2012). Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press.
21. Reason, J. (2016). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Routledge.
22. Wireman, T. (2005). Developing Performance Indicators for Managing Maintenance. Industrial Press.
23. Campbell, J. D., Jardine, A. K. S., & McGlynn, J. (2016). Asset Management Excellence (4th ed.). CRC Press.
24. Pintelon, L., & Parodi-Herz, A. (2008). Maintenance: An evolutionary perspective. In Complex System Maintenance Handbook (pp. 21–48). Springer.
25. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.
26. Tao, F., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 169–172.
27. Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems.
28. Carvalho, T. P., et al. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024.
29. Jardine, A. K. S., & Tsang, A. H. C. (2013). Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability. CRC Press.
30. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 55002: Asset Management—Guidelines for the Application of ISO 55001. ISO.
31. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
32. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
33. Kahraman, C. (Ed.). (2008). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Springer.
34. United States Department of Defense. (2008). Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Handbook. DoD.
35. International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems—Requirements. ISO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Kosasih, Dian Anggraini Purwaningtyas, Riyanto Saputro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1.png)
.png)
.png)
