Evaluation of the Teaching-Learning Process of Gas Turbine Engine Fundamental Using Generic Features of Good Teaching

Ego Widoro; Robinson  Situmorang; Uwes  Anis Chaeruman

doi:10.54147/langitbiru.v17i01.966

Ego Widoro Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Robinson Situmorang Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Uwes Anis Chaeruman Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54147/langitbiru.v17i01.966

Keywords: gas turbine engine fundamental, generic features of good teaching, qualitative approach, teaching and learning evaluation, vocational higher education

Abstract

Understanding gas turbine engines as aircraft propulsion engines is essential in aircraft maintenance. It was found that the learning outcomes for basic turbine motor courses (gas turbine engine fundamentals) were not optimal. This research aims to learn and teach basic motorbike courses that focus on finding out learning activities based on the general features of good teaching Gall et al. (2007) in the basic course on turbine motors at the TPU D.IV Study Program. This research was conducted in June-July 2022 and used qualitative methods with semi-structured interviews, observations, and theoretical studies to collect qualitative data. Six findings, namely lack of student involvement; activity plans inside and outside lectures are inadequate; need to maintain and plan better practical activities; no program for implementing understanding in the classroom; and emphasis on activities in pairs or groups. The limitation of this research is that it only examines teaching and learning activities. There may be other parameters that can influence academic achievements such as student characteristics, availability of learning materials, facilities, etc., or developing learning with a structured active learning approach to maintain student involvement and understanding of the content that needs to be carried out in further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010, January). Defining Student Engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: an Introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Groccia, J. E. (2018). What Is Student Engagement? In New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Vol. 2018, Issue 154, pp. 11–20). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287
Insley, J., & Turkoglu, C. (2020). A contemporary analysis of aircraft maintenance-related accidents and serious incidents. Aerospace, 7(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE7060081
International Air Transport Association. (2021). Safety Report 2020 (Issue April 1, 2021).
Jones, B. J., & Sturrock, K. (2022). Just by being here, you aren’t halfway there: Structured active learning and its integration in virtual learning environments and assessment. Science & Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.05.005
Khan, F. N., Ayiei, A., Murray, J., Baxter, G., & Wild, G. (2020). A preliminary investigation of maintenance contributions to commercial air transport accidents. Aerospace, 7(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7090129
Kioulepoglou, P., & Makris, I. (2023). Factors Affecting Passengers’ Acceptance of Single Pilot Operations: A Qualitative Study conducted in Greece. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.58940/2374-6793.1800
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. In New Directions for Institutional Research (Issue 141, pp. 5–20). Wiley Interscience. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Lampiran Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Udara, Advisory Circular (AC) 147-02 Basic Certificate Curriculum and Syllabus Development, Amendment: 0, Pub. L. No. KP 269 Tahun 2017 (2017).
Lee, J., & Mitici, M. (2020). An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 202, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107052
Nergård, V. (2014). Airmanship - A qualitative approach. Aviation, 18(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2014.969882
Nergard, V., Hatlevik, O. E., Martinussen, M., & Lervag, A. (2011). An airman’s personal attitude: Pilots’ point of view. Aviation, 15(4), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2011.651789
Pappalepore, I., & Farrell, H. (2017). Redressing the balance: Inverted hierarchies in the tourism classroom. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 21(Part B), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.10.001
Teoh, H. C., Abdullah, M. C., Roslan, S., & Daud, S. (2013). An Investigation of Student Engagement in a Malaysian Public University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.075
Yildirim, M. T., & Kurt, B. (2018). Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine Health Monitoring System by Real Flight Data. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9570873